our purposeproducer profilesnewsyouth profileslinkscontact ushome


Animal Welfare

Consumers today are increasingly questioning the quality and care taken in the production of meat, milk and eggs. Some of that concern stems from the fact that companion animals are increasingly being viewed by society as family members. While many recognize and accept that there is a difference between animals used as companions and animals used for nourishment, farmers and ranchers agree that animals raised for whatever purpose should be humanely cared for.

Stalls can be in a sow's best interest - video
Activists: How influencial are they - (audio version) / (print article)
Are free range hens happier? Maybe not!
Free-range hens experience stress
Study finds poultry production to be environmently friendly
        Our story  / full 96-page report
Are humans and animals equal?  Trent Loos comments. Click here to listen.
Expensive campaign brewing in California
Questions raised about validity of HSUS video
Initiatives are 'battle for the country'
It's about the cycle of life - commentary
Decisions being made by those not knowing agriculture? - audio commentary
USDA's Dr. Richard Raymond talks about the beef recall - audio
Recall not really about food safety
Slaughter inspection 101
Hallmark case more than he said, she said  - commentary

Animal welfare expert Dr. Stanley Curtis of the University of Illinois
offers his insight in this exclusive series:
Is a new social contract in order?
Consumer provider social contract needs updating
 Welfare requires transparency, accountability, responsibility


Experts issue united position on animal welfare
Leading animal welfare experts – Drs. Stanley Curtis, Temple Grandin and John McGlone – have not always been in agreement on matters related to the welfare of farm animals but given the current debate surrounding several critical welfare issues, they have come together to offer a mutual position that they believe is in the best interest of production animals. Their position is counter to that of some activist groups that say they are looking out for the animals yet have not fully explored the science behind their agendas. Specific topics addressed by the scientists are the use of sow gestation stalls and controlled atmosphere stunning/killing of poultry. Click here to view their position statement. 


Want to know more? Hear input from scientific experts, industry and others:  

What is known about sow housing and handling and are some of the movements underway to change industry practices in the best interest of the animals?

The Science

  • Dr. Stanley Curtis, animal scientist, University of Illinois
     Video -   Sow housing
     Video -   Animal handling
  • Dr. Janice Siegford, Certified associate applied animal behaviorist and assistant professor, Michigan State University
       Video    Audio

  • Arizona Proposition 204 commentary by Trent Loos
       Audio
  • Prop 204: Preying on Arizona  Post-election commentary by Trent Loos
       Audio


The Science

  • Dr. Janice Siegford, Cerfified associate applied animal behaviorist and assistant professor, Michigan State University
       Video     Audio     

Industry's View

  • Marie Wheatley, president, American Humane Association, Free Farmed Program
       Video     Audio
  • Scott Schneider, Nature Link Farms, a cage-free producer in southern Wisconsin
       Video     Audio
  • Jeffery Armstrong, dean of the College of Agriculture, Michigan State University
       Video      Audio
  • Gene Gregory, president, United Egg Producers
       Video

  • Trent Loos Talks with Philip Clemens of Hatfield Quality Meats
       Audio



The Science

  • Dr. Wes Jamison, animal welfare specialist, University of Florida
      Video       Audio

  • Dr. Stanley Curtis, animal scientist, University of Illinois
     Video

  • Trent Loos talks with Dr. Stanley Curtis, animal scientist at the University of Illinois
     Audio